Canada Gets 4 More of the Same. What Does it Mean for O&G?

October 21 Canada held its elections for Prime Minister. The Western provinces held out much hope in a change of guard to a Conservative government however the individual chose to represent the party, Andrew Scheer, was in question on many levels.

In the end Canada chose to re-elect the Liberal government spearheaded by Justin Trudeau. Much to the decry of the Western, the election results exposed a gapping hole in how divided Canada really is.

Saskatchewan, Alberta and British Columbia all voted Conservative while Quebec and Ontario would ultimately be the ones to push the Liberals in to another 4 years. This should come as no surprise with those two provinces holding 80% of the entire population of the country.

Back to the election night results…

So when numbers began to roll in showing the successes of the Liberal party and likelihood of a re-election, Western provinces began to vocalize their frustrations. Why? It’s important to understand that over the past four years under the Liberals, Western provinces, particularly Alberta, have seen funding cuts and a decapitation of the energy sector by Liberal policies including the no more pipelines Bill.

Rob Evants, a oifield worker with an Edmonton Fluid Sampling and Analysis company, had this to say…

Honestly my co-workers in O&G and I are all concerned about what the future holds for us under another 4 years with Liberals at the helm. Its as though they’ve declared war on the Alberta energy sector.

And Rob isn’t alone in his thoughts. In fact there is a trending movement #wexit that proposes a referendum of Western provinces independence from Eastern Canada which is incredibly decisive. Canada is upset. That is clear.

So while Canada appears to be going through post-election hangover, the oil and gas industry of Alberta especially, are beginning to plan for the next 4 years under Trudeau.

Premier Jason Kenney says Alberta’s budget will be full of tough choices needing to be made to get Alberta’s multi-billion-dollar budget deficits back into balance in four years and prevent punishing future interest payments on the debt. Kenney’s budget for Alberta was delivered recently on October 24th and is currently being debated and analyzed for revisions before final passage.

A well-known Grande Prairie laboratory services company, Intricate, believes that optimism is the best route moving forward for Alberta.

What can we do? Let’s just see how, with a minority government, the Liberals can address the concerns many (Western) Canadians have moving forward.

 

The Definitive Article on the Differences Between Meter Proving & Testing

Quite simply, meter proving where the reliability of a meter is tested. Anytime we talk about meter proving there’s lots of parameters and the figures can vary on impulse depending on the model of meter and method of testing. As for instance, a gas meter prover checks the accuracy and reliability for gas meters.. It’s not as simple as you might presume in terms of meter proving, the provers have to evaluate and after that compare to pre-calculated details as reported by their guide.

Meter proving and meter testing differ. This is the differences.

For starters meter proving occurs whenever a specialist measures the correctness of a meter. NIST or The National Institute of Standards and Technology, has loads of critical information in their databases in which meter proving technicians can possibly use and compare their outcomes from what ever meter they had been examining.

Proving is really common for fluid hydrocarbon metering and notably for pipeline custody transfer. Unique prover connections are necessary for the metering station enabling parallel measuring of the fluid in both of these devices.

METER PROVINGWhile meter testing has been around in excess of a century the exact standard is out there at present as it did Each. This makes testing using this method is at risk to many different variations and insecurities.

Gas provers test gas meters considering that they are probably the most prevalent.Provers are oftentimes utilised in gas meter repair facilities, domestic gas meter service centers, and public works service centers. The function in which meter proving experts test the correctness of a meter is by passing air through after which comparing those outcomes to the meter’s own internal displacement. Once that is performed the prover (meter) then can take the data he/she captured in the percentage of air transported to that of the value displayed on the meter’s own.

A bell prover has two layers, one inside tank enclosed by an additional exterior shell. A space amongst the inner tank and exterior shell is filled up with a sealing liquid, usually oil. An inverted container, also known as the bell, is placed over the tank that is inner. The fluid is there to behave as an airtight seal for testing. Bell provers are ordinarily counterweighted to provide pressure level that is positive to a hose and valve interconnected to a meter. We very often see wheels that are on the bell that enables soft linear movement with no danger of ruining the stress developed by the bell seal shifting.

Bells have a quantity of air which has been preset by measured temperatures, pressure level additionally, the effective diameter of the bell. Each and every bell scale, attached up and down, is exclusive to its matched bell. Meter proving is definitely complex. The prover must give consideration to lots of elements like flow rate, leakages, sealed units, air flow and liquid flow. Every one of them need to get confirmed against trade set standards.” adds Mark Dulbit, of Harvest Oilfield Services, a Calgary turnaround and shutdown services company servicing the oil and gas sector in BC and Alberta Canada.

The invention of programmable logic controllers (PLC) permitted gas meter maintenance facilities to automate many of the manual bell prover’s function and calculations. As opposed to manually elevating and lowering the bell prover, solenoid valves affixed to a PLC controls air flows through the meter. Each automated techniques are served by serving appropriate data in to a computer to see the outcomes. As early as the 90s, computers and PAC (Programmable Automated Controls) had been made use of. Detectors to read the index of a meter have been incorporated to further automate the process, removing the majority of the human error associated with manual bell provers.

As everybody knows, technology is in constant flux and improving day-to-day. Now we have the capability to test flow rates with consistency never seen before by employing vacuum provers. Such a use eliminated the necessity for a bell, as the flow rate is provided through the nozzles. Testers using vacuum to confirm flow rates will apply the Bernoulli’s principle. The best part about employing digital automatic components in proving is that live data might be collected and transmitted across an central network enabling dynamic analyzation of live data.